Measuring Quality In Wound Care
- Fri, 12/9/11 - 11:36am
- 0 Comments
- 1357 reads
It is estimated that 2% of the US population has a chronic wound and a conservative estimation of the cost of caring for these wounds exceeds $50 billion dollars per year. The current reimbursement model of outpatient care has continued to reward both physicians and hospitals for performing high cost, advanced therapeutics without a feedback mechanism for quality. Although the debate regarding how to measure “quality of care” may seem recent, these ideas actually date back to the early 1900s with the work of Dr. Ernest Codman. He developed the Minimum Standard for Hospitals to help eliminate substandard care. The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA, renamed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) first attempted to measure and publicly report hospital outcomes in 1986 but it withdrew its “mortality measures” because of widespread criticism. In 1999, The Joint Commission (TJC) began to develop a set of core measures for hospitals. The core measures were formally adopted by an act of Congress in 2003 as the basis for a reimbursement incentive for voluntary performance reporting among hospitals. In the century since Codman’s initial work, debate has continued to rage regarding exactly what represents a measure of “quality” for healthcare providers. It was for this purpose that The National Quality Forum (NQF) was created.
Dressed for Success: What Clinicians Need to Know about Ordering Wound Dressings
- Thu, 10/6/11 - 9:03am
- 2 Comments
- 3486 reads
Over the years we have seen many sad illustrations of what happens when patients don’t have proper wound dressings. We have all seen patients arrive with dressings made from paper towels, cleaning rags, saran wrap or underwear. Sadly, in some cases, the problem was not that patients lacked insurance coverage for dressing supplies, but that no caregiver had told them of this benefit. Patients followed for months by clinicians who ought to have known better (eg, excellent surgeons) are stunned and then angry when they discover that they have needlessly paid large sums of money “out of pocket” for dressings. Patients can lose faith in the clinical skills of a practitioner who is uninformed about issues like dressing coverage policy! So, the first thing clinicians need to know is that most patients who have medical insurance have some sort of DME coverage for dressings.
The Surgical Dressing Policy: Still Alive and Well
- Thu, 5/12/11 - 9:01am
- 0 Comments
- 2245 reads
More times than we’d like to acknowledge, we have encountered new patients in our practice who either are covering their open wounds with paper towels, mini-pads or tissue because they simply couldn’t afford even gauze and tape for coverage, or even more disconcerting, have gone from using the most basic gauze dressings to more advanced dressings and expressed concern at the costs they have incurred over time simply because they had not been informed that either their insurance or their Medicare Part B plan would have provided coverage.
Work That Happens Before The Patient Is Seen: The Chargemaster and the Billing Cycle
- Thu, 3/3/11 - 5:02pm
- 0 Comments
- 4466 reads
In 2007, TWC published an issue on Before the patient can be seen, the clinic has to determine how it will prepare a bill (charges) for the services rendered to the patient. This means that every hospital clinic needs to develop a chargemaster that is specific to their department in order to capture charges and ensure consistent billing. The layout of individual facility chargemasters varies from hospital to hospital; however, it includes a core group of data elements that correspond to all of the services, procedures and supplies that may be used in that facility.
The Debridement Dilemma Returns
- Fri, 2/4/11 - 10:00am
- 0 Comments
- 10081 reads
In 2007, TWC published an issue on debridement, which included a “test” for clinicians to help them assess their ability to properly code these procedures. Kathleen Schaum, Dot Weir and I worked hard on that issue and found that despite the fact we thought we knew the topic very well, the complexities of the system made it a challenging issue to write. Debridement coding is about to get even more complicated. In January 2011, coding for wound debridement will change significantly. Kathleen Schaum’s Business Briefs article explains the specific coding changes.
Compression Pitfalls: Improving Patient Adherence With Compression Therapy
- Wed, 12/22/10 - 11:10am
- 0 Comments
- 1609 reads
It is a well-accepted fact that compression therapy is considered the standard of care for patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). In the absence of significant lower extremity arterial disease, the use of different types of compression wraps and garments are often the single most effective component of CVI treatment. The external pressure of the compression wrap on the underlying venous system assists the calf muscle pump in the return of blood to the heart and lungs from the lower extremities, decreasing the venous hypertension that is the causative factor in many lower extremity ulcerations. Observing the effect of compression on patients with ulcers related to CVI can be an incredibly rewarding experience for the clinician because when appropriately applied, edema reduction is rapid and ulcer improvement is sure to follow. However, we are often faced with patients who are unable to maintain these wraps and dressings for the time period that they are supposed to be worn. It is a frequent occurrence to have patients return to the clinic with their compression wrap out of place or worse, having taken it off at home. Regardless of advanced dressing options and alternative treatments, CVI therapy without adequate compression usually results in further ulcer breakdown.
An Overview of Compression Therapy
- Mon, 10/18/10 - 11:25am
- 2 Comments
- 3604 reads
Compression therapy has been used to treat a number of conditions ranging from tired, aching legs to varicose veins, chronic venous disease, and deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
The Challenges of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Clinical Practice
- Thu, 6/10/10 - 11:30am
- 0 Comments
- 4753 reads
The Challenges of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Clinical Practice
This article is a joint effort by Dot and Caroline, bringing together perspectives from our combined (too many to confess) years of practice. We have brought our slightly different but complementary viewpoints together on the clinical challenges of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT).
Multiple Mechanisms of NPWT
- Thu, 6/10/10 - 10:42am
- 1 Comments
- 1807 reads
Contrary to what you might believe it is vital for wound care companies to have a completely unbiased view of the published scientific literature relating to their industry. Here I share my recent thinking as we enter a period of quickening development into the science behind the clinical effects of NPWT (Negative Pressure wound Therapy). It doesn’t pretend to be a comprehensive review but sets out the critical components for understanding the mechanisms.
No Country for Old Wound Care
- Wed, 5/5/10 - 3:37pm
- 0 Comments
- 1839 reads
It doesn’t seem like it’s been nearly 20 years since a pharmacologically-based company called Curative began working with hospitals to create outpatient wound care centers and expanded to manage nearly 200 such centers across the country.






